A PhD, MD, JD's Search for the Truth & Answers
The function of a PhD (Doctor of Philosophy; Doctoral research degree) is to solve problems.
The function of a MD (Medical Doctor; Allopathic Physician) is to treat problems.
The function of a JD (Juris Prudence Doctor; Attorney) is to cause problems.
The importance differences between these doctorate degrees is not subtle and the distinction is very important.
During the 2019 COVID pandemic, MD's found themselves looking for answers, many were not trained to address.
Unlike my generation, when HIV first presented the InflammoThrombotic Immunologic Response (ITIR) Disease (ITIRD) known as Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS), today's clinicians are not trained to think outside the box. They are trained to wait and do what they are told.
Some people, names omitted, have claimed to have cured AIDS. They have not!
As a physicist (PhD), I am trained to look for answers. The purpose of a PhD degree is to teach you to think, to solve problems, to advance the field you receive your PhD in. To receive your doctorate, you must by definition, do something no one else has done. You must solve a problem or advance your field in some way not done before. Once completed you are required to reduce your work to written format and then defend it before your thesis committee.
As a PhD this is what I have spent my life doing - answering questions; solving problems. When 2019 happened I simply shifted my focus and work to the virus and the disease it was responsible for causing; to find answers that had not been found before.
As a MD, I focused the research, based upon what we knew about viral treatments and what I had already developed - the FMTVDM patent and ITIRD theory.
Armed with both the patent and the theory I began my clinical trial to determine what treatments worked, which did not, and what treatments had no effect.
By August of 2020, not only had I completed the work on what treatments worked and which did not [https://www.flemingmethod.com/documentation]; but, I had also introduced my concerns that, based upon the evidence [https://www.flemingmethod.com/gain-of-function], SARS-CoV-2 was the result of genetic manipulation of Corona Viruses (CVs).
Armed with material showing the research funding and development of SARS-CoV-2 and armed with efforts by Fort Detrick to recruit me as a physicist to work on biological agents funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), I gave a 4 and 1/2 hour presentation [https://www.flemingmethod.com/event-2021] in Dallas, TX pm Saturday 5 June 2021, laying out the details of who funded the research and development of SARS-CoV-2.
Specifically, the evidence showed Gain-of-Function (GoF) modification of CVs, in violation of the 1975 Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) Treaty, the 1989 Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act and the 2012 Federal Law Prohibiting the development of Biological Weapons- 18 U.S.C. § 175.
On 12 August 2021, Kevin W. McCairn, PhD; Luc Montagnier PhD, and I submitted our affidavits in support of complaints filed by lead attorneys Kaira S. McCallum and Malinda Mayne [UK 143/21] - joined by attorneys Peter Weis, Erik Schmidt and Marica Pirosikova [Slovakia 133/21], Patrice Lepiller and Raphael Cohen [France 271/21] and Tomas Nielsen [Czech Republic 326/21] calling upon the International Criminal Court (ICC) to prosecute the individuals responsible for the violation of the BWC Treaty.
On 20 September 2021, Nazi Concentration Camp survivors Moshe Brown, Hillel Handler and Vera Sharav filed a letter in support of our affidavits and the filed ICC cases [https://www.flemingmethod.com/copy-of-covid-19].
By April of 2022, a series of presentations collectively known as the Crimes Against Humanity Tour (CAHT) began in the United States, including presentations provided by me further detailing the origins of SARS-CoV-2 [https://www.flemingmethod.com/gain-of-function].
Included within my CAHT presentations was material related to the inefficient and somewhat problematic World Health Organization (WHO) response to the pandemic.
Beginning in late summer 2022, I and a group of concerned Americans, established a website in an effort to elicit the assistance of State Attorney Generals and Governors; calling for the investigation of the origins of SARS-CoV-2.
The website [https://www.10letters.org/] resulted in approximately 1200 letters being sent to Governors and State AGs.
Beginning in late 2023 and extending throughout 2024 into 2025, the Prime Minister (PM) of Slovakia, Mr. Robert Fico, appointed a plenipotentiary to evaluate the Slovakian response to COVID.
As a result of these investigations, the plenipotentiary, Dr. Peter Kotlár came to similar conclusions. First, that SARS-CoV-2 was man made. Second, that the WHO response was ineffective and problematic. Third, that there were problems with, what I called, eugenic genetic vaccines or EGVs.
As a result, Dr. Kotlár reached out to me for information and assistance. Following this I provided a series of presentations with supporting documents.
Despite resistance to the information by some, PM Fico remained steadfast in his support of Dr. Kotlár.
During early 2025, Dr. Kotlár and I, along with Sona Pekova, MD, PhD, from the Tilia Laboratories for Molecular Diagnostics of the Czech Republic carried out a series of investigations on multiple vaccines provided to Slovakian people during the COVID pandemic.
Among these were the Pfizer and Moderna EGVs. Our investigations involved a determination of potential contaminants within the vaccines themselves.
The results of this research was first verified, followed by efforts to publish the first peer reviewed research into the DNA and mRNA contents of the Pfizer and Moderna EGVs; a process which as you will soon see was successful in May of 2025.
Following these efforts by Drs. Kotlár, Pekova and myself, I submitted documentation of the research and funding of SARS-CoV-2 in violation of the BWC Treaty and Federal Law as laid out above to U.S. AG Bondi on 27 February 2025.
Within the material was a USB drive with roughly 10,000 documents - including expert documents, a DVD deposition given by me under oath, two books I have written detailing information AG Bondi would require for investigation and indictment of those responsible, and a cover letter explaining the material provided to her.
Following my material sent to U.S. Attorney General Bondi on 27 February 2025, Dr. Kotlár sent a letter in support of these investigations along with efforts he had undertaken in Slovakia. In this letter to Bondi, Dr. Kotlár called upon the U.S. Attorney General to address the crimes committed against the Slovakian and American people.
This letter established the collaborative efforts being taken by Kotlár, Pevoka and Fleming as we determined the content of the Pfizer and Moderna EGVs.
These communications with U.S. Attorney General Bondi also included communications with HHS Secretary RFK, Jr.
As we have seen, much of the effort to address the COVID pandemic revolved around the development of a new generation of vaccines - genetic vaccines.
These genetic vaccines hold promise, yet like many tools, there also carry the risk of abuse. These genetic vaccines can alter human genes - that which is the code of life, i.e. the code that distinguishes each person from another and each species from another - and therefore are by definition eugenic; eugenic genetic vaccines (EGVs).
In a rush to develope a vaccine, the two groups of individuals involved in the research - those developing the SARS-CoV-2 viruses & those developing EGVs - were brought together.
As with most things new - these EGVs polarized people into two opposing camps. Those who saw the promise and those who saw the danger in these EGVs.
As a research scientist, I know the need to remove any emotional response from the scientific response. Entanglement of emotion and intellect can produce more problems than antimatter-matter annihilation - my thesis for those of you interested in knowing.
As my scientific (PhD), clinical (MD) and legal (JD) brains merged together on the challenges before us, I found myself not only working on the origins of the SARS-CoV-2 viruses and the treatment of these viruses with the ITIRD (disease) they produced; I also found myself looking at the EGVs themselves.
As you saw in the last section, the work I published on the interaction between the EGVs and blood, demonstrated both prion effect and ITIR, when the EGVs were added directly to human blood.
To the best of my knowledge, this was and remains the only peer reviewed published research on this important EGV-blood interaction.
I think it is fair to say that this addition to our knowledge has not been warmly received by everyone. Publication of this research took 14-months, with journal after journal responding by saying publication of these results could cause people to question the vaccines. Tradition!
Traditions can be good; but, unfortunately they can also prevent us from moving forward, from advancing, from understanding or even looking for the truth.
For decades, following the discovery of penicillin by Professor Sir Alexander Fleming, physicians by tradition have - some would argue - over prescribed antibiotics.
As a result, many bacterial that originally responded to some of our antibiotics, no longer do.
By exchanging genetic material - deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) - between different bacteria, typically exchanged by plasmids (small circular extrachromosomal DNA), the first bacterially resistant type of bacteria can share it's genetic ability to resist an antibiotic with another bacteria, rendering the second bacteria resistant to the antibiotic as well.
In some instances, as I have discussed elsewhere on this website, producing Bacterially Aggravated Atherosclerosis (BAA).
During the COVID pandemic, changes in the SARS-CoV-2 viruses, known as variants, demonstrated resistance to the EGVs.
The following two graphics show data I compiled, comparing the SARS-CoV-2 variant shifts with resistance and the emergence of new variants of the viruses, as the various EGVs were deployed world wide.
These graphics demonstrate the association between the introduction of EGVs and EGV pressure selection upon the various SARS-CoV-2 viruses - resulting in selection of Virus variants resistant to the ITIR produced by the body's immune system.
Just as continued exposure of a bacteria to an antibiotic can result in pressure selection of bacteria resistant to the antibiotic; so too can continued exposure of a virus - in this instance the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID) viruses to a vaccine result in pressure selection of the virus to the vaccine.
Is There a Strict Product Liability Question?
A Gap in the Vaccine Manufacturers Legal Protection from Litigation.
Questions for My Legal & Scientific Brains at Work.
In early March of 2021, I began giving presentations in Dallas, TX discussing the likelihood that the EGVs must require additional gene sequences - above and beyond those encoding for the spike protein itself - required to promote a vigorous replication of the spike protein and stimulate the necessary ITIR.
In addition to these talks, I gave several other presentations during 2021 and 2022 comparing differences in the genetic sequences in the Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen EGVs.
These differences demanded investigation - and that investigation culminated in collaboration with
Slovakian Plenipotentiary Dr. Peter Kotlár and
Czech researcher Dr. Sona Pekova,
where we analyzed several EGVs to quantify/measure their
1) mRNA, and if present, their
2) DNA
The first of these research projects was finalized for publication in a peer reviewed medical journal by late February 2025.
Like the blood and EGV research, the process of successfully undergoing the peer review process and acceptance for publication took considerable time and patience.
On 5 May 2025, I finally received word that our research and results had been peer reviewed and accepted for publication.
Like my peer reviewed research on the EGV-blood interactions, this is the first vetted peer reviewed published research on the topic and we are calling upon the
1) The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA),
2) The European Medicines Agency (EMA) - European equivalent of the FDA, and
3) Státní Ústav Pro Kontrolu Léčív (SUKL) - Slovakian equivalent of the FDA,
to confirm or refute our findings.
In the United States we like to think we lead the way. Unfortunately, this is not always the case.
Fortunately; however, our friends in Slovakia and the Czech Republic have joined with me to lead the way forward.
We owe a debt of gratitude to Slovakian Prime Minister Mr. Robert Fico and Slovakian Plenipotentiary Dr. Peter Kotlár for moving forward with the information I have provided to them.
Actions including
(1) a call upon the USA AG Bondi to investigate and indict those responsible for funding and developing SARS-CoV-2, as well as
(2) a call to reject further controls by the WHO over national sovereignty, and
(3) a call to stop injecting the Pfizer and Moderna EGVs based upon the evidence we have provided to PM Fico.
The following presentation was made to the Slovakian people by Slovakian Prime Minister Mr. Robert Fico on 23 April 2025.