🧠 The Hidden Costs of Guesswork — Why Healthcare Needs FMTVDM FRONTIER Now
- Richard M Fleming, PhD, MD, JD

- Oct 23
- 3 min read
Updated: Oct 25
In 2025, the United States will spend nearly $5 trillion on healthcare (https://www.cdc.gov/chronic-disease/data-research/facts-stats/index.html; https://nihcm.org/publications/the-growing-burden-of-chronic-diseases). Yet despite this staggering investment, Americans continue to suffer from rising morbidity, mortality, and iatrogenic deaths—many of which stem not from lack of care, but from the wrong kind of care.
At the heart of this crisis lies a diagnostic blind spot: the widespread reliance on qualitative and semi-quantitative imaging, blood tests, and weight measurements—tools that offer peripheral clues, not direct insight into disease. These methods fail to capture the InflammoThrombotic Immunologic Response (ITIR)—the cellular-level cascade triggered by antigenic stimuli such as infections, metabolic stressors, and environmental toxins.
🔍 The Diagnostic Disconnect
Most current imaging modalities—CT, MRI, SPECT, PET—are "qualitatively" not "quantitatively" calibrated for visual image detection, not functional quantification of health problems. These tests rely on subjective interpretation, often missing the nuanced shifts in regional metabolism and blood flow that precede overt disease. Blood tests and weight measurements, meanwhile, are lagging indicators. They reflect systemic changes after damage has occurred, not the early immunologic and thrombotic shifts that signal disease in motion.
This disconnect leads to:
Delayed diagnoses
Misdiagnoses
Over treatment or under treatment
Escalating costs from preventable complications
Iatrogenic harm from inappropriate interventions
In fact, iatrogenic causes now rank as the third leading cause of death in the U.S., claiming an estimated 250,000 lives annually (https://www.cdc.gov/chronic-disease/data-research/facts-stats/index.html). Globally, that number exceeds 2.5 million (https://www.cdc.gov/chronic-disease/data-research/facts-stats/index.html) —a silent epidemic fueled by diagnostic imprecision.
🧬 The ITIR Paradigm: Disease Begins at the Cellular Level
The InflammoThrombotic Immunologic Response (https://www.flemingmethod.com/) is the common denominator across conditions as varied as:
Myocardial infarction (MI)
Stroke (CVA)
Miscarriage
Diabetes mellitus
Infections
Cancer
These conditions arise from imbalances in inflammation, blood flow, thrombosis and immunologic response, often triggered by antigenic stimuli such as:
Antigenic Stimuli | Examples |
Lipid dysregulation | Cholesterol, triglycerides |
Metabolic stress | Obesity, lack of exercise |
Oxidative damage | Homocysteine, reactive oxygen species |
Immune triggers | Cytokines, interleukins, infectious agents |
Genetic predisposition | Lipoprotein(a), complement factors |
These responses are measurable, but only with tools designed to quantify them—not guess at them.
🚀 Enter FMTVDM FRONTIER: Precision Over Assumption
FMTVDM FRONTIER is not just another imaging tool. It is a quantitative, AI²-driven platform that:
Standardizes cameras and protocols
Quantifies regional metabolic and blood flow differences
Tracks changes in health and disease over time
Measures treatment outcomes with precision
Defines health and disease states—not just detects them
By directly measuring the ITIR response, FMTVDM FRONTIER shifts diagnostics from reactive to proactive, from qualitative to quantitative, and from guesswork to guardianship.
💡 Why This Matters Now
With chronic diseases accounting for 90% of U.S. healthcare spending (https://www.cdc.gov/chronic-disease/data-research/facts-stats/index.html; https://nihcm.org/publications/the-growing-burden-of-chronic-diseases) and avoidable mortality (https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/article-abstract/2831735) rising across all states —the cost of continuing with outdated diagnostics is no longer just financial. It’s existential.
FMTVDM FRONTIER offers the new standard: one that aligns with the biology of disease, the urgency of precision, and the ethics of care.





Comments